Dogville (2003)

Dogville

Great cinema (and great art, in general) comments on the human condition. Dogville does more than comment. It raises questions. It depicts the human experience in barren conditions. It conjures up characters and situations that are as complex and human as real life. Lars von Trier’s film is a tragic and lifelike parable with the ability to connect with audiences all around the world. Its raw emotional power comes mostly from its story, but there are plenty of contributing factors which make Dogville a masterful film.

In an admirably restrained performance, Nicole Kidman plays Grace, a fugitive from the mob who happens upon the small, isolated town of Dogville. In desperation, she agrees to work in exchange to live among the townspeople. Of course, complications arise and Grace eventually questions whether or not Dogville is safe.

It was a bold move to shoot this story on a soundstage instead of a more realistic outdoor set. While the choice risks losing audience interest, the stage serves as an ideal setting. The invisible wall surrounding the town produces a sense of detachment from the outside world. Furthermore, the lack of visual detail only makes the tale even more universal and timeless. When I began the film, I thought the use of the stage would limit the movie’s effectiveness. Maybe Dogville would have been more potent with a ‘normal’ set. I believe the film works anyway.

With restrictions such as the set, there is even more pressure on the cast to deliver convincing performances. Fortunately, Kidman is surrounded by a group of talented and experienced actors and actresses: Paul Bettany, Lauren Bacall, Harriet Andersson, and Stellan Skarsgard are a few. The collective believability of their work here has the ability to convince audiences to accept the movie’s eccentricities.

Dogville may come across as ‘uncinematic’ to some. The film is narrated by John Hurt in a voice-over that sounds like a reading of some classic 20th century novel. In addition to the use of a stage, the story also concerns itself with human nature and moral questions in a way that invites comparisons to Shakespeare. There is also an abundance of dialogue, but as Sidney Lumet once declared, “Dialogue is not uncinematic.” What makes Dogville a great film is the way the camera responds to the performers and the way the editing fills the movie with tension like air in a balloon.

Though it may sometimes feel more like a play than a movie, Dogville still makes for a compelling and unique viewing. Without a doubt, it is a challenging and draining affair as well, running just under three hours long. Luckily, von Trier’s vision remains a success due to its actors, its screenplay, and its excellent camerawork. Even though the film becomes a little sloppy in the final act, it is not enough to prevent an ultimately rewarding cinematic experience.

A

About these ads

26 responses to “Dogville (2003)

  1. right then, another movie for me to check out, Thanks man! been going round this one on Netflix for ages so may check it out now. Melancholia was superb if you seen that too. Your review has made my decision for me. like!

  2. Nice review. I’ve never been big on Lars Von Triers, but this sounds really intriguing. I owe this a watch as well as Melancholia.

    • Thanks. If you’re not too keen on Von Trier, then it’d probably be best to see Melancholia first, just because it’s probably a little easier to watch and it’s not three hours long. They both are worth a watch though.

  3. I love this movie. It’s one of my favorite performances by Kidman.

    “With restrictions such as the set, there is even more pressure on the cast to deliver convincing performances.”

    This observation is spot-on. I feel exactly the same. I also liked that the objects that the characters interact with are limited. When they do interact or pick up something that is visible, like the chain or the figurines (I will never forget the breaking of them), they function more as symbols.

    “Dogville” may not be easily digestible but there is no doubt in my mind that it deserves to be seen by many.

    • Oh man! That scene where the figurines are broken is just heartbreaking. The use of symbolism in the film is fascinating and part of the reason that I think it’s so great. Dogville is certainly hard to watch, but I agree with you that it deserves the attention of many. Thanks for the comment, Franz.

    • It might be difficult, but it’s very much worth the time and effort that it takes to watch it. I definitely think you should see it, especially if you’re wanting more Von Trier. Thanks!

  4. Excellent post Garrett. Thank god someone has finally highlighted this film. I absolutely loved it. I’m a big fan of Von Trier and I rate this as his best film. I imagine that many will not take to it but it’s simply brave and outstanding work from all involved.

    • Once I saw it I knew I would have to review it. I love highlighting these type of films that dare to do something unique. I’m in agreement with you that it’s an absolutely brilliant work. Thanks, Mark!

  5. Pingback: Movie Report Card: May 2013 | Cinema Train·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s